SEC Filing | Booz Allen Hamilton

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Download XBRL

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-34972

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

26-2634160

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, Virginia		22102
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(703) 902-5000

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


	Shares Outstanding as of October 31, 2011
Class A Common Stock		127,556,598
Class B Non-Voting Common Stock		2,704,310
Class C Restricted Common Stock		1,696,670
Class E Special Voting Common Stock		10,140,067

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		2

ITEM 1	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	2

ITEM 2	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	14

ITEM 3	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	27

ITEM 4	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		28

ITEM 1	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	28

ITEM 1A	RISK FACTORS	28

ITEM 2	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	28

ITEM 3	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	28

ITEM 4	(REMOVED AND RESERVED)	28

ITEM 5	OTHER INFORMATION	28

ITEM 6	EXHIBITS	29

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	September 30, 2011			March 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
	(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	356,220		$	192,631
Accounts receivable, net of allowance		1,031,545			1,111,004
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		83,645			62,014

Total current assets		1,471,410			1,365,649
Property and equipment (less accumulated depreciation of $165.0 million and $138.1 million at September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively)		188,789			173,430
Intangible assets, net		232,016			240,238
Goodwill		1,177,031			1,163,549
Other long-term assets		66,923			81,157

Total assets	$	3,136,169		$	3,024,023

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	36,250		$	30,000
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses		425,972			406,310
Accrued compensation and benefits		343,961			396,996
Other current liabilities		25,427			32,829

Total current liabilities		831,610			866,135
Long-term debt, net of current portion		943,628			964,328
Income tax reserve		66,255			90,474
Other long-term liabilities		223,898			195,836

Total liabilities		2,065,391			2,116,773
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, Class A — $0.01 par value — authorized, 600,000,000 shares; issued, 127,807,003 shares at September 30, 2011 and 122,784,835 shares at March 31, 2011; outstanding, 127,473,228 shares at September 30, 2011 and 122,784,835 shares at March 31, 2011		1,278			1,227
Non-voting common stock, Class B — $0.01 par value — authorized, 16,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 2,801,180 shares at September 30, 2011 and 3,053,130 shares at March 31, 2011		28			31
Restricted common stock, Class C — $0.01 par value — authorized, 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 1,706,670 shares at September 30, 2011 and 2,028,270 shares at March 31, 2011		17			20
Special voting common stock, Class E — $0.003 par value — authorized, 25,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 10,140,067 shares at September 30, 2011 and 12,348,860 shares at March 31, 2011		30			37
Treasury stock, at cost — 333,775 shares at September 30, 2011 and 0 shares at March 31, 2011		(5,377	)		—
Additional paid-in capital		882,242			840,058
Retained earnings		197,798			71,330
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,238	)		(5,453	)

Total stockholders’ equity		1,070,778			907,250

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	3,136,169		$	3,024,023

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)						(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Revenue	$	1,429,044		$	1,367,214		$	2,875,880		$	2,709,143
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		715,642			698,563			1,442,473			1,375,658
Billable expenses		380,911			359,243			773,101			715,529
General and administrative expenses		220,290			217,911			432,125			418,330
Depreciation and amortization		18,536			19,588			36,394			38,972

Total operating costs and expenses		1,335,379			1,295,305			2,684,093			2,548,489

Operating income		93,665			71,909			191,787			160,654
Interest expense		(12,194	)		(38,830	)		(24,488	)		(79,183	)
Other, net		4,051			(6,803	)		3,609			(7,110	)

Income before income taxes		85,522			26,276			170,908			74,361
Income tax expense		10,190			11,459			44,440			31,375

Net income	$	75,332		$	14,817		$	126,468		$	42,986

Earnings per common share (Note 3):
Basic	$	0.58		$	0.14		$	0.98		$	0.40

Diluted	$	0.53		$	0.12		$	0.90		$	0.35

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(Amounts in thousands)				(Amounts in thousands)
Net income	$	75,332	$	14,817	$	126,468	$	42,986
Actuarial gain related to employee benefits, net of taxes		108		82		215		164

Comprehensive income	$	75,440	$	14,899	$	126,683	$	43,150

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)


	Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(Amounts in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	126,468		$	42,986
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of state and local transportation business		(4,082	)		—
Transaction costs on sale of state and local transportation business		(5,432	)		—
Depreciation and amortization		36,394			38,972
Amortization of debt issuance costs		2,400			7,186
Amortization of original issuance discount on debt		550			2,224
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options		(15,960	)		(15,779	)
Stock-based compensation expense		18,448			27,295
Loss on disposition of property and equipment		10			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		71,045			45,769
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(6,674	)		(20,874	)
Other long-term assets		11,847			19,939
Accrued compensation and benefits		(49,198	)		(25,565	)
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses		21,135			11,398
Accrued interest		4,694			4,146
Income tax reserve		(24,219	)		680
Other current liabilities		(6,412	)		(629	)
Other long-term liabilities		(3,897	)		33,137

Net cash provided by operating activities		177,117			170,885
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(43,640	)		(38,957	)
Escrow payments		—			1,384
Proceeds from sale of state and local transportation business		23,332			—

Net cash used in investing activities		(20,308	)		(37,573	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		4,695			1,002
Repayment of debt		(15,000	)		(95,925	)
Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options		15,960			15,779
Stock option exercises		6,502			4,523
Repurchases of common stock		(5,377	)		—

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		6,780			(74,621	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		163,589			58,691
Cash and cash equivalents––beginning of period		192,631			307,835

Cash and cash equivalents––end of period	$	356,220		$	366,526

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	17,085		$	69,639

Income taxes, net	$	50,072		$	2,717

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data or unless otherwise noted)

September 30, 2011

1. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Organization

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, including its wholly owned subsidiaries, or the Company, provides management and technology consulting services primarily to the U.S. government and its agencies in the defense, intelligence, and civil markets. The Company offers clients functional knowledge spanning strategy and organization, analytics, technology, engineering, and operations, which it combines with specialized expertise in clients’ mission and domain areas to help solve critical problems. The Company, an affiliate of The Carlyle Group, or Carlyle, was incorporated in Delaware in May 2008 and is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, with approximately 26,000 employees as of September 30, 2011.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Company prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. As a result, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The Company followed the accounting policies used and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2011, or Annual Report. The Company’s fiscal year ends on March 31 and unless otherwise noted, references to fiscal year or fiscal are for fiscal years ended March 31.

The interim financial information in this Quarterly Report reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments except as otherwise disclosed, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations for the interim periods. The results of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially from management’s estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which amends Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. This guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The guidance is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is permitted. The Company will early adopt as of our measurement date, January 1, 2012. The implementation of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and through the filing date did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company computes basic and diluted earnings per share amounts based on net income for the periods presented. The Company uses the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period to calculate basic earnings per share, or EPS. Diluted EPS is computed similar to basic EPS, except the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding common stock options and other stock-based awards.

The Company currently has outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock, Class B Non-Voting Common Stock, Class C Restricted Common Stock, and Class E Special Voting Common Stock. Class E Special Voting Common Stock shares are not included in the calculation of EPS as these shares represent voting rights only and are not entitled to participate in dividends or other distributions.

Basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented are computed as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Earnings for basic and diluted computations	$	75,332	$	14,817	$	126,468	$	42,986
Weighted-average Class A Common Stock outstanding		125,883,669		104,329,887		124,432,403		103,543,008
Weighted-average Class B Non-Voting Common Stock outstanding		2,833,324		3,053,130		2,929,808		2,861,073
Weighted-average Class C Restricted Common Stock outstanding		1,739,986		2,028,270		1,863,790		2,028,270

Total weighted-average common shares outstanding for basic computations		130,456,979		109,411,287		129,226,001		108,432,351
Dilutive stock options and restricted stock		10,802,985		13,098,121		11,374,985		13,305,491

Average number of common shares outstanding for diluted computations		141,259,964		122,509,408		140,600,986		121,737,842

Earnings per common share
Basic	$	0.58	$	0.14	$	0.98	$	0.40

Diluted	$	0.53	$	0.12	$	0.90	$	0.35

In the EPS calculation for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, 2,220,000 options and 1,750,000 options, respectively, were not included in the EPS calculation as their impact was anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, 514,896 shares of Class A Common Stock with certain restrictions, or Class A Restricted Stock, were not included in the EPS calculation as they have not vested. Such options and Class A Restricted Stock may have a dilutive effect in future periods.

4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, goodwill was $1,177.0 million and $1,163.5 million, respectively. The increase in the carrying amount of goodwill is primarily attributable to the increase in the deferred payment obligation as a result of the release of approximately $24.0 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by a $10.7 million reduction to goodwill related to the sale of the Company’s state and local transportation business.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following:


	As of September 30, 2011						As of March 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value		Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Amortizable intangible assets
Contract backlog	$	160,615	$	119,225	$	41,390	$	160,800	$	111,330	$	49,470
Favorable leases		2,800		2,374		426		2,800		2,232		568

Total		163,415		121,599		41,816		163,600		113,562		50,038
Unamortizable intangible assets
Trade name		190,200		—		190,200		190,200		—		190,200

Total	$	353,615	$	121,599	$	232,016	$	353,800	$	113,562	$	240,238

Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $4.1 million and $7.1 million, respectively, and $8.2 million and $14.3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following:


	September 30, 2011			March 31, 2011
Current
Accounts receivable–billed	$	426,120		$	466,688
Accounts receivable–unbilled		608,003			645,664
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(2,578	)		(1,348	)

Accounts receivable, net		1,031,545			1,111,004
Long-term
Unbilled receivables related to retainage and holdbacks		21,288			17,075

Total accounts receivable, net	$	1,052,833		$	1,128,079

The Company recognized a provision for doubtful accounts of $2.3 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2.9 million and $5.3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Long-term unbilled receivables related to retainage, holdbacks, and long-term rate settlements to be billed at contract closeout are included in other long-term assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

6. ACCRUED COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

Accrued compensation and benefits consisted of the following:


	September 30, 2011		March 31, 2011
Bonus	$	39,605	$	136,503
Retirement		138,453		93,826
Vacation		133,447		133,643
Other		32,456		33,024

Total accrued compensation and benefits	$	343,961	$	396,996

7. DEFERRED PAYMENT OBLIGATION

In connection with the merger transaction as described in the Company’s Annual Report, or the acquisition, the Company established a deferred payment obligation, or DPO, of $158.0 million, payable 8.5 years after July 31, 2008, less any settled claims. Of the $158.0 million, $78.0 million was required to be paid in full to the selling shareholders and $80.0 million is available to indemnify the Company for certain pre-acquisition tax contingencies, related interest and penalties, and other matters pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 15, 2008, as amended as of July 30, 2008. On December 11, 2009, in connection with the recapitalization transaction as described in the Company’s Annual Report, $100.4 million was paid to selling shareholders, of which $78.0 million was the repayment of that portion of the DPO described above, with $22.4 million representing accrued interest. Any amounts remaining after the settlement of claims will be paid out to selling shareholders.

As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company has recorded $66.3 million and $90.5 million, respectively, for pre-acquisition uncertain tax positions, of which approximately $28.5 million and $52.7 million, respectively, may be indemnified under the remaining available DPO. During the six months ended September 30, 2011, the Company favorably settled approximately $29.0 million of its pre-acquisition uncertain tax positions, thereby reducing the estimated amount to be indemnified under the remaining available DPO and increasing the DPO amount to be paid to the selling shareholders. Accordingly, the $67.0 million and $38.2 million DPO balances recorded as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively, within other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, represent the residual balance estimated to be paid to the selling shareholders based on consideration of contingent tax claims, accrued interest, and other matters.

A reconciliation of the principal balance of the DPO to the amount recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for the periods presented are as follows:


	September 30, 2011			March 31, 2011
Deferred payment obligation	$	80,000		$	80,000
Indemnified pre-acquisition uncertain tax positions		(28,502	)		(52,721	)
Accrued interest		15,475			10,904

Amount recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets	$	66,973		$	38,183

8. DEBT

Debt consisted of the following:


	September 30, 2011						March 31, 2011
	Interest Rate			Outstanding Balance			Interest Rate			Outstanding Balance
Tranche A Loans		2.51	%	$	485,030			2.81	%	$	497,185
Tranche B Loans		4.00	%		494,848			4.00	%		497,143

Total					979,878						994,328
Less: Current portion of long-term debt					(36,250	)					(30,000	)

Long-term debt, net of current portion				$	943,628					$	964,328

The Company maintains a senior secured credit agreement, as amended, with a syndicate of lenders. The senior secured credit

agreement, as amended, provides for $1.0 billion in term loans ($500.0 million of Tranche A Loans and $500.0 million of Tranche B Loans) and a $275.0 million revolving credit facility. The loans under the senior secured credit agreement, as amended, are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The senior secured agreement, as amended, requires quarterly principal payments of 1.25% of the stated principal amount of the Tranche A Loans, with annual incremental increases to 1.875%, 2.50%, 3.125%, and 16.25%, prior to the Tranche A Loans’ maturity date of February 3, 2016, and 0.25% of the stated principal amount of the Tranche B Loans, with the remaining balance payable on the Tranche B Loans’ maturity date of August 3, 2017. The revolving credit facility matures on July 31, 2014, at which time any outstanding principal balance is due in full. As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding on the revolving credit facility.

The total outstanding debt balance is recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, net of unamortized discount of $5.1 million and $5.7 million as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.

At September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company was contingently liable under open standby letters of credit and bank guarantees issued by the Company’s banks in favor of third parties. These letters of credit and bank guarantees, which totaled $2.2 million and $1.9 million as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively, primarily relate to leases and support of insurance obligations. These instruments reduce the Company’s available borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

The senior secured credit agreement, as amended, requires the maintenance of certain financial and non-financial covenants. As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.

9. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 11.9% and 43.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 26.0% and 42.2% for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same prior year periods is primarily due to the release of uncertain tax position reserves in the current quarter. The three and six month effective tax rate of 11.9% and 26.0%, respectively, differ from the statutory rate of 35.0% due to the release of uncertain tax positions, state taxes and the effect of other permanent rate differences, which primarily related to meals and entertainment.

The Company settled its Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, audit for fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006 during the quarter. The IRS adjusted the Company’s research credit claims for the audit years. The adjustments did not result in a material change to the Company’s financial position. Due to the federal audit settlement, the Company released approximately $24.0 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions in the current quarter. The Company is also subject to taxes imposed by various taxing authorities including state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax years that remain open and subject to examination related to state and foreign jurisdictions are not considered to be material or will be indemnified under the merger agreement as described in the Company’s Annual Report. Additionally, due to statute of limitations expirations and potential audit settlements, it is reasonably possible that a portion of the reserves recorded on previously recognized tax benefits may be effectively settled by March 31, 2012.

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company utilized $14.9 million of its capital loss carryforward from the disposition of the state and local transportation business. In prior periods, the Company had provided a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets associated with the capital loss carryforward. As a result, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $5.9 million in the three and six months ended September 30, 2011.

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company sponsors the Employees’ Capital Accumulation Plan, or ECAP, which is a qualified defined contribution plan that covers eligible U.S. and international employees. ECAP provides for distributions, subject to certain vesting provisions, to participants by reason of retirement, death, disability, or termination of employment. Total expense recognized under ECAP for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $55.5 million and $57.3 million, respectively, and $114.7 million and $113.6 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company-paid contributions for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $28.3 million and $24.6 million, respectively, and $70.0 million and $62.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Defined Benefit Plan and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

The Company maintains and administers a defined benefit retirement plan and a postretirement medical plan for current, retired, and resigned officers.

Total expense for the Company’s Retired Officers’ Bonus Plan was $217,000 and $216,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $434,000 and $432,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Retired Officers’ Bonus Plan is an unfunded plan and contributions are made as benefits are paid. As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the accumulated liability of $4.7 million and $5.2 million, respectively, included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets is unfunded.

The components of net postretirement medical expense for the Officer Medical Plan were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Service cost	$	1,000	$	841	$	1,956	$	1,682
Interest cost		724		642		1,493		1,284

Total postretirement medical expense	$	1,724	$	1,483	$	3,449	$	2,966

As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the unfunded status of the Officer Medical Plan was $55.5 million and $52.8 million, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

11. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

The common stock shares activity consisted of the following:


	Class A Common Stock			Class B Non-Voting Common Stock			Class C Restricted Common Stock			Class E Special Voting Common Stock			Treasury Stock
Balance at March 31, 2010		102,922,900			2,350,200			2,028,270			13,345,880			—

Issuance of common stock		16,189,830			—			—			702,930			—
Stock options exercised		4,375,035			—			—			(1,699,950	)		—
Share exchange		(702,930	)		702,930			—			—			—

Balance at March 31, 2011		122,784,835			3,053,130			2,028,270			12,348,860			—

Issuance of common stock		829,429			—			—			—			—
Stock options exercised		3,619,189			—			—			(2,208,793	)		—
Share exchange		573,550			(251,950	)		(321,600	)		—			—
Repurchase of common stock		(333,775	)		—			—			—			333,775

Balance at September 30, 2011		127,473,228			2,801,180			1,706,670			10,140,067			333,775

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 2010, the Company established a tax qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, which is designed to enable eligible employees to periodically purchase shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock up to an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares at a five percent discount from the fair market value of the Company’s common stock. The ESPP provides for quarterly offering periods, the first of which commenced on April 1, 2011. For the first quarterly offering period that closed on June 30, 2011, 133,223 Class A Common Stock shares were purchased by employees under the ESPP. For the second quarterly offering period that closed on September 30, 2011, 161,106 Class A Common Stock shares were purchased by employees under the ESPP.

12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Cost of revenue	$	2,213		3,357	$	5,269	$	7,884
General and administrative expenses		5,558		8,278		13,179		19,411

Total	$	7,771	$	11,635	$	18,448	$	27,295

As of September 30, 2011, there was $41.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based compensation agreements. The unrecognized compensation cost as of September 30, 2011 is expected to be amortized over the next 4.75 years.

Officers’ Rollover Stock Plan

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, 0 and 766,890 shares of Class C Restricted Common Stock, or Class C Restricted Stock, vested, respectively. Total compensation expense recorded in conjunction with all Class C Restricted Stock for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $148,000 and $854,000, respectively, and $740,000 and $2.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Future compensation cost related to non-vested Class C Restricted Stock not yet recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $686,000, and is expected to be recognized over 1.75 years.

A portion of the old stock rights held by Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.’s U.S. government consulting partners issued under the stock rights plan that existed for Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.’s Officers prior to the merger transaction, as described in the Company’s Annual Report, were exchanged for new options, or Rollover Options. As of September 30, 2011, there were 9,437,102 Rollover Options outstanding, of which 3,758,750 options were unvested. As Rollover Options granted to retirement eligible Officers were fully vested as of September 30, 2011, the remaining 3,758,750 options unvested as of September 30, 2011 represent only non-retirement eligible options. Total compensation expense recorded in conjunction with all Rollover Options for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $2.0 million and $6.6 million, respectively, and $7.1 million and $14.8 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Future compensation cost related to non-vested Rollover Options not yet recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $7.6 million, and is expected to be recognized over 1.75 years.

As permitted under the terms of the Officers’ Rollover Stock Plan, or the Rollover Plan, the Compensation Committee, as Administrator of the Rollover Plan, authorized on June 3, 2011 the payment of withholding taxes not to exceed the minimum statutory withholding amount arising in connection with the exercise of Rollover Options through the surrender of shares of Class A common stock, issuable upon the exercise of such Rollover Options. The Company extended this offer to the holders of the Rollover Options to provide for an additional alternative to either paying the minimum required withholding tax arising in connection with the exercise of the Rollover Options from each holder’s existing personal funds or from the proceeds of the open market sale of a portion of the shares issuable upon the exercise of the Rollover Options. The surrender program was limited to the Rollover Options that were required to be exercised between June 30, 2011 and September 15, 2011 and, for those holders who elected to participate, the trade date was August 12, 2011 for the exercise of the Rollover Options. As a result of this transaction, the Company repurchased 333,775 shares at $16.11 and recorded them as treasury shares at a cost of $5.4 million.

Equity Incentive Plan

On July 1, 2011 and August 10, 2011, 60,000 and 140,000 options, respectively, were granted under the Equity Incentive Plan, or EIP. The estimated fair value of the common stock on July 1, 2011 and August 10, 2011, at the time of the option grant, was $19.08 and $16.07, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, there were 11,867,854 EIP options outstanding, of which 8,149,550 were unvested. Total compensation expense recorded in conjunction with EIP options for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $3.1 million and $4.1 million, respectively, and $8.0 million and $10.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Future compensation cost related to non-vested EIP options not yet recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $25.8 million, and is expected to be recognized over 4.75 years.

Grants of Class A Restricted Common Stock

On April 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted 20,231 shares of Class A Restricted Stock to certain Board members for their continued service to the Company. These shares vest in equal installments on September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2012, and were issued with an aggregate grant date fair value of $370,000. Total compensation expense recorded in conjunction with this grant for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 was $139,000 and $278,000 respectively. Future compensation cost related to this award not yet recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $93,000 and is expected to be recognized over the next six months. There were no additional shares authorized to be issued under the April 2011 Compensation Committee grant.

On July 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted 514,869 shares of Class A Restricted Stock in conjunction with the new Annual Incentive Plan adopted on October 1, 2010. The amount of the annual incentive payment was determined based on performance targets established by the Compensation Committee and a portion of the bonus was paid in the form of Class A Restricted Stock. Equity awards will vest based on the passage of time, subject to the officer’s continued employment by the Company. The portion to be paid in the form of equity will be recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations based on grant date fair value over the vesting period of three years and the aggregate value was estimated at $9.8 million based on the stock price of $19.08 on the grant date. Total compensation expense recorded in conjunction with this grant for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $2.3 million. Future compensation cost related to this award not yet recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $7.5 million and is expected to be recognized over the next 2.75 years.

December 2009 Dividend

As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a stock-based compensation liability of $25.8 million and $31.4 million, respectively, in other long-term liabilities, related to the reduction in stock option exercise price associated with a

dividend paid in December 2009. The Company also recorded $8.9 million and $9.0 million as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively, of a stock-based compensation liability in accrued compensation and benefits, which represents the amounts of the reduction in stock option exercise price expected to be paid within one year. Options vested and not yet exercised that would have had an exercise price below zero as a result of the dividend were reduced to one cent, with the remaining reduction to be paid in cash upon exercise of the options. Refer to the Company’s Annual Report for further discussion of the dividend paid in December 2009.

13. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 approximated its carrying value of $356.2 million and $192.6 million, respectively, because of the short-term nature of these accounts. The fair value of the Company’s debt instruments as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 approximated its carrying value of $979.9 million and $994.3 million, respectively. The fair value of debt is determined based on interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company’s existing debt arrangements.

14. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company is an affiliate of Carlyle and from time to time, and in the ordinary course of business: (1) other Carlyle portfolio companies engage the Company as a subcontractor or service provider, and (2) the Company engages other Carlyle portfolio companies as subcontractors or service providers. Revenue and cost associated with these related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2011 were $343,000 and $305,000, respectively, and $946,000 and $852,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Revenue and cost associated with these related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, and $5.0 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

On July 31, 2008, the Company entered into a management agreement, or Management Agreement, with TC Group V US, L.L.C., or TC Group, a company affiliated with Carlyle. In accordance with the Management Agreement, TC Group provides the Company with advisory, consulting, and other services and the Company pays TC Group an aggregate annual fee of $1.0 million, plus expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $250,000 in advisory fees. For the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred $500,000 in advisory fees.

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

As a result of the July 2008 merger transaction, as described in the Company’s Annual Report, the Company assigned a total of nine leases to Booz & Co. The facilities are located in New York, New York; Troy, Michigan; Florham Park, New Jersey; Parsippany, New Jersey; Houston, Texas; Chicago, Illinois; Cleveland, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; and London, England. Except for the Cleveland and Dallas leases, which expired, the Company remains liable under the terms of the original leases should Booz & Co. default on its obligations. There were no events of default under theses leases as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011. The maximum potential amount of undiscounted future payments is $41.4 million, and the leases expire at different dates between February 2012 and March 2017. Based on the Company’s assessment of the likelihood of future payment, no amounts have been recorded related to the Company’s contingent liability on such leases.

Government Contracting Matters

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, 98% of the Company’s revenue was generated from contracts with U.S. government agencies or other U.S. government contractors. Contracts with the U.S. government are subject to extensive legal and regulatory requirements and, from time to time and in the ordinary course of business, agencies of the U.S. government investigate whether the Company’s operations are conducted in accordance with these requirements and the terms of the relevant contracts by using investigative techniques as subpoenas or civil investigative demands. U.S. government investigations of the Company, whether related to the Company’s U.S. government contracts or conducted for other reasons, could result in administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines, or penalties being imposed upon the Company, or could lead to suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracting. Management believes it has adequately reserved for any losses that may be experienced from any investigation of which it is aware. The Defense Contract Management Agency Administrative Contracting Officer has negotiated annual final indirect cost rates through fiscal year 2006. Audits of subsequent years may result in cost reductions and/or penalties. Management believes it has adequately reserved for any losses that may be experienced from any such reductions and/or penalties. As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company has recorded a liability of approximately $115.8 million and $100.2 million, respectively, for its current best estimate of net amounts to be refunded to customers for potential adjustments from such audits or reviews of contract costs incurred subsequent to fiscal year 2006.

Litigation

The Company is involved in legal proceedings and investigations arising in the ordinary course of business, including those relating to employment matters, relationships with clients and contractors, intellectual property disputes, and other business matters. These legal proceedings seek various remedies, including claims for monetary damages in varying amounts that currently range up to $40.0 million or have a reasonably estimated outcome within that range, or are unspecified as to amount. Although the outcome of any such matter is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, management does not expect any of the currently ongoing audits, reviews, investigations, or litigation to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Six former officers and stockholders who had departed the firm prior to the acquisition, as described in the Company’s Annual Report, have filed a total of nine suits, with original filing dates ranging from July 3, 2008 through December 15, 2009 (three of which were amended on July 2, 2010 and then further amended into one consolidated complaint on September 7, 2010) against the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers. Each of the suits arises out of the acquisition and alleges that the former stockholders are entitled to certain payments that they would have received if they had held their stock at the time of the acquisition. Some of the suits also allege that the acquisition price paid to stockholders was insufficient. The various suits assert claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, breach of fiduciary duty, civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, violations, violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and/or securities and common law fraud. Two of these suits have been dismissed with all appeals exhausted and a third suit has been dismissed but the former stockholder has sought leave to re-plead in New York state court. Five of the remaining suits are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the sixth is pending in New York state court and the seventh is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. As of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the aggregate alleged damages sought in the seven remaining suits was approximately $348.7 million ($291.5 million of which is sought to be trebled pursuant to RICO) plus punitive damages, costs, and fees. Although the outcome of any of these cases is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, we do not expect them to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is intended to help the reader understand our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity and capital resources. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report.

The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources, and other non-historical statements in this discussion are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2011, or Annual Report, and under Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and “— Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” of this Quarterly Report. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.

Our fiscal year ends March 31 and, unless otherwise noted, references to years or fiscal are for fiscal years ended March 31. See “— Results of Operations.”

Overview

We are a leading provider of management and technology consulting services to the U.S. government in the defense, intelligence, and civil markets. As the needs of our clients have grown more complex, we have developed deep expertise in technology, engineering, and analytics. Leveraging our 97-year consulting heritage and a talent base of approximately 26,000 people, we deploy our deep domain knowledge, functional expertise, and experience to help our clients achieve their objectives. We serve substantially all of the cabinet-level departments of the U.S. government. Our major clients include the Department of Defense, all branches of the U.S. military, the U.S. Intelligence Community, and civil agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Energy, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of the Treasury, and the Environmental Protection Agency. We support these clients in addressing complex and pressing challenges such as combating global terrorism, improving cyber capabilities, transforming the healthcare system, improving efficiency and managing change within the government, and protecting the environment.

We have a collaborative culture, supported by our operating model, which helps our professionals identify and respond to emerging trends across the markets we serve and deliver enduring results for our clients.

Financial and Other Highlights

Revenue grew 4.5% from the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2011, and grew 6.2% from the six months ended September 30, 2010 to the six months ended September 31, 2011. Revenue generated by our direct consulting staff labor grew 4.0% from the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2011, and grew 5.5% from the six months ended September 30, 2010 to the six months ended September 31, 2011. Direct consulting staff labor represents our consulting staff’s labor under contracts for which we act as a prime contractor or subcontractor. Total backlog grew 16.4% to $12.9 billion from September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2011. Substantially all of our revenue and backlog is derived from services and solutions provided to client organizations across the U.S. government, primarily by our consulting staff and, to a lesser extent, our subcontractors. The mix of revenue generated by consulting staff and subcontractors affects our operating margin, substantially all of which is derived from direct consulting staff labor, as the portion of our revenue derived from fees we earn on services provided by our subcontractors is not significant. We experienced revenue growth during the three and six month periods ending September 30, 2011 with the highest revenue growth in areas relating to health and finance consulting services for civil government agencies and classified services to the U.S. Intelligence community.

Operating income grew 30.3% to $93.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $71.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, which reflects a 130 basis point increase in operating margin to 6.6% from 5.3% in the comparable periods. Operating income increased 19.4% to $191.8 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011 from $160.7 million in the six months ended September 30, 2010, which reflects an 80 basis point increase in operating margin to 6.7% from 5.9% in the comparable periods. The improvement in operating income was driven by the continued growth in revenue and increased profitability resulting from decreases in incentive and stock-based compensation costs and lower amortization of our intangible assets. The increase in operating income also was due to higher profitability on contracts driven by a shift in contract mix towards fixed-price contracts, largely as a result of a decrease in time-and-material contracts, as well as improved profitability on subcontractor arrangements. The factors contributing to the increased operating income were partially offset by increases in business development costs and marketing and bid and proposal activity in preparation for the government fiscal year 2012 and other administrative costs associated with delays in deploying certain direct consulting staff labor against funded backlog.

Cash provided by operations was $177.1 million compared to $126.5 million in net income. The increase in cash provided by operations was a result of overall profitability of our contracts, our ability to invoice and collect from clients in a timely manner, and our effective management of vendor payments. Our tax payments increased by approximately $47.4 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011 principally due to the utilization of our net operating loss, or NOL, carryforward. We expect that cash taxes to be paid during the remainder of fiscal 2012 will continue to increase as the utilization of our NOL carryforward is subject to the limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.

As a result of the refinancing of our credit facilities in February 2011 which resulted in a reduction in our outstanding debt at lower interest rates, as described in our Annual Report, we realized a reduction in interest expense in the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 of $26.6 million and $54.7 million, as compared to the same prior year period.

Non-GAAP Measures

We publicly disclose certain non-GAAP financial measurements, including Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share, or EPS, because management uses these measures for business planning purposes, including to manage our business against internal projected results of operations and measure our performance. We view Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted EPS as measures of our core operating business, which exclude the impact of the items detailed below, as these items are generally not operational in nature. These non-GAAP measures also provide another basis for comparing period to period results by excluding potential differences caused by non-operational and unusual or non-recurring items. We also utilize and discuss Free Cash Flow, because management uses this measure for business planning purposes, measuring the cash generating ability of the operating business, and measuring liquidity generally. We present these supplemental measures because we believe that these measures provide investors with important supplemental information with which to evaluate our performance, long term earnings potential, or liquidity, as applicable, and to enable them to assess our performance on the same basis as management. These supplemental performance measurements may vary from, and may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures by other companies in our industry. Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted EPS, and Free Cash Flow are not recognized measurements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and when analyzing our performance or liquidity, as applicable, investors should (i) evaluate each adjustment in our reconciliation of operating and net income to Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income, and cash flows to Free Cash Flows, and the explanatory footnotes regarding those adjustments, each as defined under GAAP, (ii) use Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Diluted EPS in addition to, and not as an alternative to, operating income, net income, or diluted EPS as a measure of operating results, and (iii) use Free Cash Flows, in addition to, and not as an alternative to, net cash generated from operating activities as a measure of liquidity, as defined under GAAP. We have defined the aforementioned non-GAAP measures as follows:

•

“Adjusted Operating Income” represents operating income before (i) certain stock option-based and other equity-based compensation expenses, (ii) adjustments related to the amortization of intangible assets, and (iii) any extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring items. We prepare Adjusted Operating Income to eliminate the impact of items we do not consider indicative of ongoing operating performance due to their inherent unusual, extraordinary, or non-recurring nature or because they result from an event of a similar nature.

•

“Adjusted EBITDA” represents net income before income taxes, net interest and other expense, and depreciation and amortization and before certain other items, including: (i) certain stock option-based and other equity-based compensation expenses, (ii) transaction costs, fees, losses, and expenses, including fees associated with debt prepayments, and (iii) any extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring items. We prepare Adjusted EBITDA to eliminate the impact of items we do not consider indicative of ongoing operating performance due to their inherent unusual, extraordinary, or non-recurring nature or because they result from an event of a similar nature.

•

“Adjusted Net Income” represents net income before: (i) certain stock option-based and other equity-based compensation expenses, (ii) transaction costs, fees, losses, and expenses, including fees associated with debt prepayments, (iii) adjustments related to the amortization of intangible assets, (iv) amortization or write-off of debt issuance costs and write-off of original issue discount, and (v) any extraordinary, unusual, or non-recurring items, in each case net of the tax effect calculated using an assumed effective tax rate. We prepare Adjusted Net Income to eliminate the impact of items, net of taxes, we do not consider indicative of ongoing operating performance due to their inherent unusual, extraordinary, or non-recurring nature or because they result from an event of a similar nature.

•

“Adjusted Diluted EPS” represents diluted EPS calculated using Adjusted Net Income as opposed to net income.

•

“Free Cash Flow” represents the net cash generated from operating activities less the impact of purchases of property and equipment.

Below is a reconciliation of Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted EPS, and Free Cash Flow to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
	(In thousands, except share and per share data)						(In thousands, except share and per share data)
*Adjusted Operating Income*
Operating income	$	93,665		$	71,909		$	191,787		$	160,654
Certain stock-based compensation expense (a)		2,274			9,771			9,171			23,115
Amortization of intangible assets (b)		4,091			7,161			8,182			14,319
Transaction expenses (c)		—			63			—			135

Adjusted Operating Income	$	100,030		$	88,904		$	209,140		$	198,223

*EBITDA & Adjusted EBITDA*
Net income	$	75,332		$	14,817		$	126,468		$	42,986
Income tax expense		10,190			11,459			44,440			31,375
Interest and other, net		8,143			45,633			20,879			86,293
Depreciation and amortization		18,536			19,588			36,394			38,972

EBITDA		112,201			91,497			228,181			199,626
Certain stock-based compensation expense (a)		2,274			9,771			9,171			23,115
Transaction expenses (c)		—			63			—			135

Adjusted EBITDA	$	114,475		$	101,331		$	237,352		$	222,876

*Adjusted Net Income*
Net income	$	75,332		$	14,817		$	126,468		$	42,986
Certain stock-based compensation expense (a)		2,274			9,771			9,171			23,115
Transaction expenses (c)		—			2,613			—			2,685
Amortization of intangible assets (b)		4,091			7,161			8,182			14,319
Amortization or write-off of debt issuance costs and write-off of original issue discount		1,206			6,005			2,400			7,918
Net gain on sale of state and local transportation business (d)		(5,681	)		—			(5,681	)		—
Release of income tax reserves (e)		(23,584	)		—			(24,048	)		—
Adjustments for tax effect (f)		(3,028	)		(10,220	)		(7,901	)		(19,215	)

Adjusted Net Income	$	50,610		$	30,147		$	108,591		$	71,808

*Adjusted Diluted EPS*
Weighted-average number of diluted shares outstanding		141,259,964			122,509,408			140,600,986			121,737,842

Adjusted Net Income Per Diluted Share	$	0.36		$	0.25		$	0.77		$	0.59

*Free Cash Flow*
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	123,273		$	160,874		$	177,117		$	170,885
Less: Purchases of property and equipment		(26,039	)		(22,744	)		(43,640	)		(38,957	)

Free Cash Flow	$	97,234		$	138,130		$	133,477		$	131,928

(a)

Reflects stock-based compensation expense for options for Class A Common Stock and restricted shares, in each case, issued in connection with the acquisition described in our Annual Report under the Officers’ Rollover Stock Plan that was established in connection with the acquisition. Also reflects stock-based compensation expense for Equity Incentive Plan Class A Common Stock options issued in connection with the acquisition under the Equity Incentive Plan that was established in connection with the acquisition of our company by The Carlyle Group described in our Annual Report, which we refer to in the Quarterly Report as the acquisition.

(b)	Reflects amortization of intangible assets resulting from the acquisition described in our Annual Report.

(c)	Three and six months ended September 30, 2010 reflects certain external administrative and other expenses incurred in connection with the initial public offering.

(d)	Three and six months ended September 30, 2011 reflects the gain on sale of our state and local transportation business, net of the associated tax benefit of $1.6 million.

(e)	Three and six months ended September 30, 2011 reflects the release of income tax reserves, net of taxes.

(f)	Reflects tax effect of adjustments at an assumed marginal tax rate of 40%.

Factors and Trends Affecting Our Results of Operations

Our results of operations have been, and we expect them to continue to be, affected by the following factors, which may cause our future results of operations to differ from our historical results of operations discussed under “— Results of Operations.”

Business Environment and Key Trends in Our Markets

We believe that the following trends and developments in the U.S. government services industry and our markets may influence our future results of operations:

•

budget deficits and the growing U.S. national debt increasing pressure on the U.S. government to reduce federal spending across all federal agencies together with associated uncertainty about the size and timing of those reductions;

•

changes in the relative mix of overall U.S. government spending and areas of spending growth, with lower spending on homeland security, intelligence and defense-related programs as overseas operations end, and continued increased spending on cyber-security, advanced technology analytics, technology integration and healthcare;

•

delays in the completion of the U.S. government’s budget process, which has in the past and could in the future delay procurement of the products, services, and solutions we provide;

•

conservatism in light of existing and proposed fiscal constraints by the U.S. government and uncertainty about the size of budget reductions may cause clients to invest appropriated funds on a less consistent or rapid basis, or not at all;

•

the federal focus on refining the definition of “inherently governmental” work will continue to drive pockets of insourcing in various agencies, particularly in the intelligence market;

•

cost cutting and efficiency and effectiveness efforts by U.S. civilian agencies with a focus on increased use of performance measurement, “program integrity” efforts to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in entitlement programs, and renewed focus on improving procurement practices for and interagency use of IT services, including through the use of cloud based options and data center consolidation;

•

U.S. government agencies awarding contracts on a technically acceptable/lowest cost basis, which could have a negative impact on our ability to win certain contracts;

•

restrictions by the U.S. government on the ability of federal agencies to use lead system integrators, in response to cost, schedule and performance problems with large defense acquisition programs where contractors were performing the lead system integrator role;

•

increasingly complex requirements of the Department of Defense and the U.S. Intelligence Community, including cyber-security, managing federal health care cost growth and focus on reforming existing government regulation of various sectors of the economy, such as financial regulation and healthcare;

•

increased competition from other government contractors and market entrants seeking to take advantage of the trends identified above; and

•

efforts by the U.S. government to address organizational conflicts of interest and related issues and the impact of those efforts on us and our competitors.

Sources of Revenue

Substantially all of our revenue is derived from services provided under contracts and task orders with the U.S. government, primarily by our consulting staff and, to a lesser extent, our subcontractors. Funding for our contracts and task orders is generally linked to trends in budgets and spending across various U.S. government agencies and departments. We provide services under a large portfolio of contracts and contract vehicles to a broad client base, and we believe that our diversified contract and client base lessens potential volatility in our business. We have historically grown, and continued through the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 to grow, our revenue organically without relying on acquisitions.

Contract Types

We generate revenue under the following three basic types of contracts:

•

Cost-Reimbursable Contracts. Cost-reimbursable contracts provide for the payment of allowable costs incurred during performance of the contract, up to a ceiling based on the amount that has been funded, plus a fee. We generate revenue under two general types of cost-reimbursable contracts: cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee, both of which reimburse allowable costs and provide for a fee. The fee under each type of cost-reimbursable contract is generally payable upon completion of services in accordance with the terms of the contract. Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts offer no opportunity for payment beyond the fixed fee. Cost-plus-award-fee contracts provide for an award fee that varies within specified limits based upon the client’s assessment of our performance against a predetermined set of criteria, such as targets for factors like cost, quality, schedule, and performance.

•

Time-and-Materials Contracts. Under a time-and-materials contract, we are paid a fixed hourly rate for each direct labor hour expended, and we are reimbursed for allowable material costs and allowable out-of-pocket expenses. To the extent our actual direct labor and associated costs vary in relation to the fixed hourly billing rates provided in the contract, we will generate more or less profit, or could incur a loss.

•

Fixed-Price Contracts. Under a fixed-price contract, we agree to perform the specified work for a pre-determined price. To the extent our actual costs vary from the estimates upon which the price was negotiated, we will generate more or less profit, or could incur a loss. Some fixed-price contracts have a performance-based component, pursuant to which we can earn incentive payments or incur financial penalties based on our performance. Fixed-price level of effort contracts require us to provide a specified level of effort (i.e., labor hours), over a stated period of time, for a fixed price.

The amount of risk and potential reward varies under each type of contract. Under cost-reimbursable contracts, there is limited financial risk, because we are reimbursed for all allowable costs up to a ceiling. However, profit margins on this type of contract tend to be lower than on time-and-materials and fixed-price contracts. Under time-and-materials contracts, we are reimbursed for the hours worked using the predetermined hourly rates for each labor category. In addition, we are typically reimbursed for other contract direct costs and expenses at cost. We assume financial risk on time-and-materials contracts because our labor costs may exceed the negotiated billing rates. Profit margins on well-managed time-and-materials contracts tend to be higher than profit margins on cost-reimbursable contracts as long as we are able to staff those contracts with people who have an appropriate skill set. Under fixed-price contracts, we are required to deliver the objectives under the contract for a pre-determined price. Compared to time-and-materials and cost-reimbursable contracts, fixed-price contracts generally offer higher profit margin opportunities because we receive the full benefit of any cost savings but generally involve greater financial risk because we bear the impact of any cost overruns. In the aggregate, the contract type mix in our revenue for any given period will affect that period’s profitability. Over time we have experienced a relatively stable contract mix. However, the U.S. government has indicated an intent to increase its use of fixed-price contract procurements and reduce its use of cost-plus-award-fee contract procurements; the Department of Defense has adopted purchasing guidelines that mark a shift towards fixed-price procurement contracts.

The table below presents the percentage of total revenue for each type of contract:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Cost-reimbursable (1)		54	%		51	%		54	%		51	%
Time-and-materials		31	%		36	%		31	%		36	%
Fixed-price (2)		15	%		13	%		15	%		13	%

(1)	Includes both cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost-plus-award-fee contracts.

(2)	Includes fixed-price level of effort contracts.

Contract Diversity and Revenue Mix

We provide services to our clients through a large number of single award contracts and contract vehicles and multiple award contract vehicles. Most of our revenue is generated under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity, or ID/IQ, contract vehicles, which include multiple award government wide acquisition contract vehicles, or GWACs, and General Services Administration Multiple Award Schedule Contracts, or GSA schedules, and certain single award contracts. GWACs and GSA schedules are available to all U.S. government agencies. Any number of contractors typically compete under multiple award ID/IQ contract vehicles for task orders to provide particular services, and we earn revenue under these contract vehicles only to the extent that we are successful in the bidding process for task orders.

We generate revenue under our contracts and task orders through our provision of services as both a prime contractor and subcontractor, as well as from the provision of services by subcontractors under contracts and task orders for which we act as the prime contractor. The mix of these types of revenue affects our operating margin. Substantially all of our operating margin is derived from direct consulting staff labor and the portion of our operating margin derived from fees we earn on services provided by our

subcontractors is not significant. We view growth in direct consulting staff labor as the primary driver of earnings growth. Direct consulting staff labor growth is driven by consulting staff headcount growth, after attrition, and total backlog growth.

Our People

Revenue from our contracts is derived from services delivered by consulting staff and, to a lesser extent, from our subcontractors. Our ability to hire, retain, and deploy talent with skills appropriately aligned with client needs is critical to our ability to grow our revenue. We continuously evaluate whether our talent base is properly sized and contains an optimal mix of skills to meet the rapidly evolving needs of our clients and we seek to achieve that result through recruitment and capacity management. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, we employed approximately 25,800 and 25,100 people, respectively, of which approximately 23,300 and 22,800, respectively, were consulting staff. Attrition for consulting staff was 18.9% and 19.9% during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Contract Backlog

We define backlog to include the following three components:

•

Funded Backlog. Funded backlog represents the revenue value of orders for services under existing contracts for which funding is appropriated or otherwise authorized less revenue previously recognized on these contracts.

•

Unfunded Backlog. Unfunded backlog represents the revenue value of orders for services under existing contracts for which funding has not been appropriated or otherwise authorized.

•

Priced Options. Priced contract options represent 100% of the revenue value of all future contract option periods under existing contracts that may be exercised at our clients’ option and for which funding has not been appropriated or otherwise authorized.

Backlog does not include any task orders under ID/IQ contracts, including GWACs and GSA schedules, except to the extent that task orders have been awarded to us under those contracts.

The following table summarizes the value of our contract backlog at the respective dates presented:


	As of September 30,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Backlog:
Funded	$	3,438	$	3,123
Unfunded (1)		3,349		2,848
Priced options (2)		6,068		5,076

Total backlog	$	12,855	$	11,047

(1)	Reflects a reduction by management to the revenue value of orders for services under two existing single award ID/IQ contracts based on an established pattern of funding under these contracts by the U.S. government.

(2)	Amounts shown reflect 100% of the undiscounted revenue value of all priced options.

Our backlog includes orders under contracts that in some cases extend for several years. The U.S. Congress generally appropriates funds for our clients on a yearly basis, even though their contracts with us may call for performance that is expected to take a number of years. As a result, contracts typically are only partially funded at any point during their term and all or some of the work to be performed under the contracts may remain unfunded unless and until the U.S. Congress makes subsequent appropriations and the procuring agency allocates funding to the contract.

We view growth in total backlog and consulting staff headcount as the two key measures of our potential business growth. Growing and deploying consulting staff is the primary means by which we are able to recognize profitable revenue growth. To the extent that we are able to hire additional consulting staff and deploy them against funded backlog, we generally recognize increased revenue. Total backlog grew 16.4% from September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2011. Additions to funded backlog during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $7.0 billion as a result of the conversion of unfunded backlog to funded backlog, the award of new contracts and task orders under which funding was appropriated, and the exercise and subsequent funding of priced options. We report internally on our backlog on a monthly basis and review backlog upon occurrence of certain events to determine if any adjustments are necessary.

We cannot predict with any certainty the portion of our backlog that we expect to recognize as revenue in any future period and we cannot guarantee that we will recognize any revenue from our backlog. The primary risks that could affect our ability to recognize such revenue on a timely basis or at all are: program schedule changes, contract modifications, and our ability to assimilate and deploy new consulting staff against funded backlog; cost cutting initiatives and other efforts to reduce U.S. government spending, which could reduce or delay funding for orders for services; and delayed funding of our contracts due to delays in the completion of the U.S. government’s budgeting process and the use of continuing resolutions by the U.S. government to fund its operations. Funded backlog includes orders under contracts for which the period of performance has expired, and we may not recognize revenue on the funded backlog that includes such orders due to, among other reasons, the tardy submission of invoices by our subcontractors and the expiration of the relevant appropriated funding in accordance with a pre-determined expiration date such as the end of the U.S. government’s fiscal year. The revenue value of orders included in funded backlog that has not been recognized as revenue due to period of performance expirations has not exceeded approximately 6.6% of funded backlog as of the end of any of the eight fiscal quarters preceding the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011. In our recent experience, none of the following additional risks have had a material negative effect on our ability to realize revenue from our funded backlog: the unilateral right of the U.S. government to cancel multi-year contracts and related orders or to terminate existing contracts for convenience or default; in the case of unfunded backlog, the potential that funding will not be made available; and, in the case of priced options, the risk that our clients will not exercise their options.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Costs associated with compensation and related expenses for our people are the most significant component of our operating costs and expenses. The principal factors that affect our costs are additional people as we grow our business and are awarded new contracts, task orders, and additional work under our existing contracts, and the hiring of people with specific skill sets and security clearances as required by our additional work. In conjunction with our initial public offering, our Board of Directors adopted a new compensation plan. The equity compensation component of the new plan has reduced officer-related compensation expense included in cost of revenue and general and administrative expenses over the near term with such expense reduction to reverse over time.

Our most significant operating costs and expenses are described below.

•

Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue includes direct labor, related employee benefits, and overhead. Overhead consists of indirect costs, including indirect labor relating to infrastructure, management and administration, and other expenses.

•

Billable Expenses. Billable expenses include direct subcontractor expenses, travel expenses, and other expenses incurred to perform on contracts.

•

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include indirect labor of executive management and corporate administrative functions, marketing and bid and proposal costs, and other discretionary spending.

•

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization includes the depreciation of computers, leasehold improvements, furniture and other equipment, and the amortization of internally developed software, as well as third-party software that we use internally, and of identifiable long-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives.

Income Taxes

Our net operating loss carryforward, which as of March 31, 2011 was $148.8 million, is subject to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limits the use of a corporation’s NOLs and certain other tax benefits following a change in ownership of the corporation. We believe that it is more likely than not that the company will generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize the tax benefits of our NOL carryforward by March 31, 2013.

During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we reduced our liability for income taxes payable due to the exercise of stock options resulting in the reduction of our cash taxes of approximately $22.1 million.

The Company settled its Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, audit for fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006 during the quarter. The IRS adjusted our research credits claims for the audit years. The adjustments did not result in a material change to our financial position. Due to the federal audit close the Company released approximately $24.0 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions in the current quarter.

We are also subject to taxes imposed by various taxing authorities including state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax years that remain open and subject to examination related to state and foreign jurisdictions are not considered to be material or will be indemnified under the merger agreement. Additionally, due to statute of limitations expirations and potential audit settlements, it is reasonably possible that a portion of the reserves recorded on previously recognized tax benefits may be effectively settled by March 31, 2012.

Seasonality

The U.S. government’s fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. It is not uncommon for U.S. government agencies to award extra tasks or complete other contract actions in the weeks before the end of its fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds. In addition, we also have generally experienced higher bid and proposal costs in the months leading up to the U.S. government’s fiscal year end as we pursue new contract opportunities being awarded shortly after the U.S. government fiscal year end as new opportunities are expected to have funding appropriated in the U.S. government’s subsequent fiscal year. We may continue to experience this seasonality in future periods, and our future periods may be affected by it.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

There have been no material changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report to the information disclosed in the Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies section in Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report.

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, including its wholly owned subsidiaries, have been presented for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth items from our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Percent			Six Months Ended September 30,						Percent
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Revenue	$	1,429,044		$	1,367,214			4.5	%	$	2,875,880		$	2,709,143			6.2	%
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		715,642			698,563			2.4	%		1,442,473			1,375,658			4.9	%
Billable expenses		380,911			359,243			6.0	%		773,101			715,529			8.0	%
General and administrative expenses		220,290			217,911			1.1	%		432,125			418,330			3.3	%
Depreciation and amortization		18,536			19,588			(5.4	%)		36,394			38,972			(6.6	%)

Total operating costs and expenses		1,335,379			1,295,305			3.1	%		2,684,093			2,548,489			5.3	%

Operating income		93,665			71,909			30.3	%		191,787			160,654			19.4	%
Interest expense		(12,194	)		(38,830	)		(68.6	%)		(24,488	)		(79,183	)		(69.1	%)
Other, net		4,051			(6,803	)		(159.5	%)		3,609			(7,110	)		(150.8	%)

Income from operations and before income taxes		85,522			26,276			225.5	%		170,908			74,361			129.8	%
Income tax expense		10,190			11,459			(11.1	%)		44,440			31,375			41.6	%

Net income	$	75,332		$	14,817			408.4	%	$	126,468		$	42,986			194.2	%

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010

Revenue

Revenue increased to $1,429.0 million from $1,367.2 million, or a 4.5% increase. The increase in revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily driven by the deployment during the three month period ended September 30, 2011 of approximately 500 net additional consulting staff against funded backlog. Net additional consulting staff reflects newly hired consulting staff net of consulting staff attrition. Consulting staff increased during the period due to recruiting efforts, resulting in additions to consulting staff in excess of attrition. Additions to funded backlog during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $7.0 billion, as a result of the conversion of unfunded backlog to funded backlog, the award of new contracts and task orders under which funding was appropriated, and the exercise and subsequent funding of priced options.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue increased to $715.6 million from $698.6 million, or a 2.4% increase. This increase was primarily due to increases in salaries and salary-related benefits of $27.6 million and employer retirement plan contributions of $1.2 million. The increase in salaries and salary-related benefits was driven by headcount growth of approximately 500 net additional consulting staff during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and annual base salary increases. The increase in employer retirement plan contributions was due to an increase in the number of employees who completed one year of service and became eligible to participate in our defined contribution plan, the Employees’ Capital Accumulation Plan, or ECAP.

The cost of revenue increase was partially offset by a decrease in incentive compensation of $15.0 million. The decrease in incentive compensation was primarily due to an amendment to the Officers’ compensation plan effective October 1, 2010, such that a portion of incentive compensation is now paid via grants of restricted stock on July 1 of each year, rather than cash, and will vest over a three year period, and management’s determination to reduce incentive compensation accrual rates for fiscal year 2012 in response to higher than expected business development costs and marketing and bid and proposal activity as well as administrative costs associated with delays in deploying certain direct consulting staff labor. Stock–based compensation expense also decreased by $2.2 million for Rollover and EIP options for Class A Common Stock and restricted shares, in each case issued in connection with the acquisition as described in our Annual Report (stock-based compensation expense related to Rollover options and restricted shares issued in connection with the acquisition and the initial grant of EIP options, collectively referred to as acquisition-related compensation expenses). The decrease in acquisition-related compensation expense was primarily due to a decrease in expense recognition compared to the same prior year period due to the application of the accounting method for recognizing stock-based compensation, which requires higher expenses initially and declining expenses in subsequent years. Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was 50.1% and 51.1% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Billable Expenses

Billable expenses increased to $380.9 million from $359.2 million, or a 6.0% increase. This increase was primarily due to increases in subcontractor-related expenses of $22.9 million and travel and material expenses of $1.3 million. The increase in direct subcontractor expenses was attributable to increased use of subcontractors in proportion to revenue growth. The increased use of subcontractors was necessary to support growth on existing and new contracts and task orders during the three months ended September 30, 2011. Billable expenses as a percentage of revenue were 26.7% and 26.3% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased to $220.3 million from $217.9 million, or a 1.1% increase. This increase was primarily due to increases in salaries and salary-related benefits of $16.1 million associated with increased headcount and other expenses to support the increased scale of our business.

The increase in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by a decrease in incentive compensation of $11.9 million. The decrease in incentive compensation was primarily due to an amendment to the Officers’ compensation plan effective October 1, 2010, such that a portion of incentive compensation is now paid via grants of restricted stock on July 1 of each year, rather than cash, and will vest over a three year period, and lower incentive compensation accrual rates for fiscal year 2012. Stock–based compensation expense also decreased by $5.3 million due to a reduction in acquisition-related compensation expenses. The decrease in acquisition-related compensation expense was primarily due to a decrease in expense recognition compared to the same prior year period due to the application of the accounting method for recognizing stock-based compensation, which requires higher expenses initially and declining expenses in subsequent years. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 15.4% and 15.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased to $18.5 million from $19.6 million, or a 5.4% decrease. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $3.1 million in the amortization of our intangible assets, which includes below market rate leases and contract backlog that were recorded in connection with the acquisition, as described in our Annual Report, and are amortized based on contractual lease terms and projected future cash flows, respectively, thereby reflecting higher amortization expense initially and declining expense in subsequent periods. Intangible asset amortization expense decreased to $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased to $12.2 million from $38.8 million, or a 68.6% decrease. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in contractually obligated interest expense as a result of the repayment of indebtedness outstanding under our mezzanine credit facility and the refinancing of our senior secured loan facilities at lower interest rates in February 2011.

Interest is accrued on our $985.0 million outstanding debt principal balance as of September 30, 2011 at contractually specified rates ranging from 2.5% to 4.0%, and is generally required to be paid to our syndicate of lenders on a quarterly basis.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense decreased to $10.2 million from $11.5 million, or a 11.1% decrease. This decrease was primarily due to the release of uncertain tax position reserves of approximately $24.0 million in the current quarter.

The effective tax rate decreased to 11.9% from 43.6% primarily due to the release of uncertain tax position reserves in the current quarter.

Six Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended September 30, 2010

Revenue

Revenue increased to $2,875.9 million from $2,709.1 million, or a 6.2% increase. The increase in revenue during the six months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily driven by the deployment during the six month period ended September 30, 2011 of approximately 500 net additional consulting staff against funded backlog. Consulting staff increased during the period due to recruiting efforts, resulting in additions to consulting staff in excess of attrition. Additions to funded backlog during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $7.0 billion, as a result of the conversion of unfunded backlog to funded backlog, the award of new contracts and task orders under which funding was appropriated, and the exercise and subsequent funding of priced options.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue increased to $1,442.5 million from $1,375.7 million, or a 4.9% increase. This increase was primarily due to increases in salaries and salary-related benefits of $74.7 million and employer retirement plan contributions of $3.6 million. The increase in salaries and salary-related benefits was driven by headcount growth of approximately 500 net additional consulting staff during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and annual base salary increases. The increase in employer retirement plan contributions was due to an increase in the number of employees who completed one year of service and became eligible to participate in ECAP.

The cost of revenue increase was partially offset by decreases of $15.5 million in incentive compensation and $4.0 million in acquisition-related compensation expenses. The decrease in incentive compensation was due to an amendment to the Officers’ compensation plan such that a portion of incentive compensation will be paid in stock-based compensation in July 2012, rather than cash, and will vest over a three year period, and management’s determination to reduce incentive compensation accrual rates for fiscal year 2012 in response to higher than expected business development costs and marketing and bid and proposal activity as well as administrative costs associated with delays in deploying certain direct consulting staff labor. The decrease in acquisition-related compensation expense was primarily due to a decrease in expense recognition compared to the same prior year period due to the application of the accounting method for recognizing stock-based compensation, which requires higher expenses initially and declining expenses in subsequent years. Cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue was 50.2% and 50.8% in the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Billable Expenses

Billable expenses increased to $773.1 million from $715.5 million, or an 8.0% increase. This increase was primarily due to increases in subcontractor-related expenses of $51.2 million and travel and material expenses of $6.3 million. The increase in direct subcontractor expenses was attributable to increased use of subcontractors in proportion to revenue growth. The increased use of subcontractors was necessary to support growth on existing and new contracts and task orders during the six months ended September 30, 2011. Billable expenses as a percentage of revenue were 26.9% and 26.4% in the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased to $432.1 million from $418.3 million, or a 3.3% increase. This increase was primarily due to increases in salaries and salary-related benefits of $28.0 million associated with increased headcount and other expenses to support the increased scale of our business.

The increase in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by decreases of $16.5 million in incentive compensation and $9.9 million in acquisition-related compensation expenses. The decrease in incentive compensation was primarily due an amendment to the Officers’ compensation plan such that a portion of incentive compensation will be paid in stock-based compensation in July 2012, rather than cash, and will vest over a three year period, and lower incentive compensation accrual rates for fiscal year 2012. The decrease in acquisition-related compensation expense was primarily due to a decrease in expense recognition compared to the same prior year period due to the application of the accounting method for recognizing stock-based compensation, which requires higher expenses initially and declining expenses in subsequent years. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 15.0% and 15.4% for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased to $36.4 million from $39.0 million, or a 6.6% decrease. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $6.1 million in the amortization of our intangible assets, which includes below market rate leases and contract backlog that were recorded in connection with the acquisition, as described in our Annual Report, and are amortized based on contractual lease terms and projected future cash flows, respectively, thereby reflecting higher amortization expense initially and declining expense in subsequent periods. Intangible asset amortization expense decreased to $8.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $14.3 million for the six months ended September 30, 2010.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased to $24.5 million from $79.2 million, or a 69.1% decrease. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in contractually obligated interest expense as a result of the repayment of indebtedness outstanding under our mezzanine credit facility and the refinancing of our senior secured loan facilities at lower interest rates in February 2011.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense increased to $44.4 million from $31.4 million, or a 41.6% increase. This increase was primarily due to an increase in year to date pre-tax income as compared to the same prior year period offset by the release of uncertain tax position reserves in the current quarter.

The effective tax rate decreased to 26.0% from 42.2% primarily due to the release of uncertain tax position reserves in the current quarter.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically been able to generate sufficient cash to fund our operations, debt payments, capital expenditures, and discretionary funding needs. We had $356.2 million and $192.6 million in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. However, due to fluctuations in cash flows and the growth in operations, it may be necessary from time to time in the future to borrow under our senior secured loan facilities to meet cash demands. We anticipate that cash provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents, and borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next twelve months, which primarily include:

•

operating expenses, including salaries;

•

working capital requirements to fund the growth of our business;

•

capital expenditures which primarily relate to the purchase of computers, business systems, furniture, and leasehold improvements to support our operations;

•

debt service requirements for borrowings under our senior secured loan facilities; and

•

cash taxes to be paid.

Our debt totaled $985.0 million and $994.3 million as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. Our debt bears interest at specified rates and is held by a syndicate of lenders (see Note 8 in our interim consolidated financial statements).

Our senior secured loan facilities consist of a $500.0 million Tranche A term facility, or Tranche A Loans, and a $500.0 million Tranche B term facility, or Tranche B Loans. As of September 30, 2011, we had $487.5 million and $497.5 million principal outstanding under the Tranche A term facility and Tranche B term facility, respectively.

From time to time we evaluate alternative uses for excess cash resources, including debt prepayments, payment of dividends, share repurchases or funding acquisitions. Any determination to pursue one or more of the above alternative uses for excess cash is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors, and will depend upon various factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity requirements, restrictions that may be imposed by applicable law, our contracts, and our senior secured credit agreement, as amended, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

Cash Flows

Cash received from clients, either from the payment of invoices for work performed or for advances in excess of costs incurred, is our primary source of cash. We generally do not begin work on contracts until funding is appropriated by the client. Billing timetables and payment terms on our contracts vary based on a number of factors, including whether the contract type is cost-reimbursable, time-and-materials, or fixed-price. We generally bill and collect cash more frequently under cost-reimbursable and time-and-materials contracts, as we are authorized to bill as the costs are incurred or work is performed. In contrast, we may be limited to bill certain fixed-price contracts only when specified milestones, including deliveries, are achieved. We experienced a slight shift to fixed-price contracts year over year resulting in no material impact to operating cash flow. In addition, a number of our contracts may provide for performance-based payments, which allow us to bill and collect cash prior to completing the work.

Accounts receivable is the principal component of our working capital and is generally driven by revenue growth with other short-term fluctuations related to the payment practices of our clients. Our accounts receivable reflect amounts billed to our clients as of each balance sheet date. Our clients generally pay our invoices within 30 days of the invoice date. At any month-end, we also include in accounts receivable the revenue that was recognized in the preceding month, which is generally billed early in the following month. Finally, we include in accounts receivable amounts related to revenue accrued in excess of amounts billed, primarily on our fixed-price and cost- plus-award-fee contracts. The total amount of our accounts receivable can vary significantly over time, but is generally sensitive to revenue levels. Total accounts receivable (billed and unbilled combined, net of allowance for doubtful accounts) days sales outstanding, which we calculate by dividing total accounts receivable by revenue per day during the relevant fiscal quarter, was 68 as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011.

The table below sets forth our net cash flows for the periods presented:


	Six Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
	(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	177,117		$	170,885
Net cash used in investing activities		(20,308	)		(37,573	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		6,780			(74,621	)

Total increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	163,589		$	58,691

Net Cash from Operating Activities

Net cash from operations is primarily affected by the overall profitability of our contracts, our ability to invoice and collect from clients in a timely manner, and our ability to manage our vendor payments. Net cash provided by operations was $177.1 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $170.9 million in the same prior year period, or a 3.6% increase. The increase in net cash provided by operations was primarily due to net income growth and the decrease in cash used for accrued compensation and benefits, partially offset by an increase in cash taxes paid.

Net Cash from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $20.3 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $37.6 million in the same prior year period, or a 46% decrease. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to cash proceeds received of $23.3 million from the sale of our state and local transportation business. Capital expenditures also increased from $39.0 million to $43.6 million in the six months ended September 30, 2010 to 2011, respectively. This increase is attributable to investments in additional facility expansion and computer equipment to support the increase in headcount. We expect capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue in future years to be more comparable to historical levels.

Net Cash from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $6.8 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $74.6 million in the same prior year period, or a 109.1% increase. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to the repayment of debt during the six months ended September 30, 2010.

Indebtedness

We maintain a senior secured credit agreement, as amended, with a syndicate of lenders. The senior secured credit agreement, as amended, provides for $1.0 billion in term loans ($500.0 million of Tranche A Loans and $500.0 million of Tranche B Loans) and a $275.0 million revolving credit facility.

The senior secured credit agreement, as amended, requires quarterly principal payments of 1.25% of the stated principal amount of Tranche A Loans, with annual incremental increases to 1.875%, 2.50%, 3.125%, and 16.25%, prior to the Tranche A Loans’ maturity date of February 3, 2016, and 0.25% of the stated principal amount of Tranche B Loans, with the remaining balance payable on the Tranche B Loans’ maturity date of August 3, 2017. The revolving credit facility matures on July 31, 2014, at which time any outstanding principal balance is due in full.

At our option, the interest rate on borrowings under the senior secured loan facilities may be based on the Eurocurrency rate or the alternate base rate, or ABR plus, in each case, an applicable margin, subject to the Eurocurrency rate and ABR being no lower than 1.00% or 2.00% respectively, in the case of Tranche B Loans. Subject to a leveraged based pricing grid, the applicable margins on Tranche A Loans range from 2.00% to 2.75% with respect to Eurocurrency loans, or 1.00% to 1.75% with respect to ABR loans. The applicable margins on Tranche B Loans are 3.00% with respect to Eurocurrency loans, or 4.00% with respect to the ABR loans, stepping down, in each case to 2.75% and 3.75%, respectively, when the total leverage ratio is less than or equal to 1.75 to 1.00. The revolving credit facility margin and commitment fee are subject to the leveraged based pricing grid, as set forth in the senior secured credit agreement, as amended. As of September 30, 2011, we were contingently liable under open standby letters of credit and bank guarantees issued by our banks in favor of third parties that total $2.2 million. These letters of credit and bank guarantees primarily relate to leases and support of insurance obligations. These instruments reduce our available borrowings under the revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2011, we had $272.8 million of capacity available for additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

The loans under the senior secured credit agreement, as amended, are secured by substantially all of our assets. The senior secured credit agreement, as amended, contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants are limited to the following: limitations on indebtedness and liens, mergers, consolidations or amalgamations, or liquidations, wind-ups or dissolutions;

dispositions of property; restricted payments; investments; transactions with affiliates; sale and lease back transactions; negative pledges; restrictive agreements; and certain other limitations or activities.

In addition, we are required to meet the following financial covenants at each quarter end:

•

Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio — the ratio of total leverage as of the last day of the quarter (defined as the aggregate principal amount of all funded debt, less cash, cash equivalents and permitted liquid investments) to the preceding four quarters’ “Consolidated EBITDA” (as defined in the senior secured credit agreement, as amended). For the period ended September 30, 2011, this ratio was required to be less than or equal to 3.9 to 1.0 to comply with our senior secured loan facilities. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our consolidated total leverage ratio with a ratio of 1.75.

•

Consolidated Net Interest Coverage Ratio — the ratio of the preceding four quarters’ “Consolidated EBITDA” (as defined in the senior secured credit agreement, as amended) to net interest expense for the preceding four quarters (defined as cash interest expense, less the sum of cash interest income and one-time financing fees (to the extent included in consolidated interest expense)). For the period ended September 30, 2011, this ratio was required to be greater than or equal to 3.0 to 1.0 to comply with our senior secured loan facilities. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our consolidated net interest coverage ratio with a ratio of 7.86.

The total outstanding debt balance is recorded net of unamortized discount of $5.1 million and $5.7 million as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.

Capital Structure and Resources

Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $1,070.8 million as of September 30, 2011, an increase of $163.5 million compared to stockholders’ equity of $907.3 million as of March 31, 2011, primarily due to common stock issuances, stock option exercises, net income of $126.5 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011, and stock-based compensation expense of $18.4 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2011, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Capital Expenditures

Since we do not own any of our facilities, our capital expenditure requirements primarily relate to the purchase of computers, business systems, furniture, and leasehold improvements to support our operations. Direct costs billed to clients are not treated as capital expenses. Our capital expenditures for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $43.6 million and $39.0 million, respectively, and the majority of such capital expenditures related to facilities infrastructure, equipment, and information technology. Expenditures for facilities infrastructure and equipment are generally incurred to support new and existing programs across our business. We also incur capital expenditures for information technology to support programs and general enterprise information technology infrastructure.

Commitments and Contingencies

We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits, and other uncertainties related to our business. For a discussion of these items, refer to Note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report, including information incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report, contains forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “outlook,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “preliminary,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give you no assurance these expectations will prove to have been correct. These forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include: cost cutting and efficiency initiatives and other efforts to reduce U.S. government spending, which could reduce or delay funding for orders for services especially in the current political environment; delayed funding of our contracts due to delays in the completion of the U.S. government’s budgeting process and the use of continuing resolutions by the U.S. government to fund its operations or related changes in the pattern or timing of government funding and spending; any issue that compromises our relationships with the U.S. government or damages our professional reputation; changes in U.S. government spending and mission priorities that shift expenditures away from agencies or programs that we support; the size of our addressable markets and the amount of U.S. government spending on private contractors; failure to comply with numerous laws and regulations; our ability to compete effectively in the competitive bidding process and delays caused by competitors’ protests of major contract awards received by us; the loss of General Services Administration Multiple Award

Schedule Contracts, or GSA schedules, or our position as prime contractor on government wide acquisition contact vehicles; changes in the mix of our contracts and our ability to accurately estimate or otherwise recover expenses, time and resources for our contracts; our ability to generate revenue under certain of our contracts; our ability to realize the full value of our backlog and the timing of our receipt of revenue under contracts included in backlog; changes in estimates used in recognizing revenue; any inability to attract, train or retain employees with the requisite skills, experience and security clearances; an inability to hire, assimilate and deploy enough employees to serve our clients under existing contracts; an inability to effectively and timely utilize our employees and professionals; failure by us or our employees to obtain and maintain necessary security clearances; the loss of members of senior management or failure to develop new leaders; misconduct or other improper activities from our employees or subcontractors; increased competition from other companies in our industry; failure to maintain strong relationships with other contractors; inherent uncertainties and potential adverse developments in legal proceedings, including litigation, audits, reviews and investigations, which may result in materially adverse judgments, settlements or other unfavorable outcomes; internal system or service failures and security breaches, including, but not limited to, those resulting from external cyber attacks on our network and internal systems; risks related to our indebtedness and credit facilities which contain financial and operating covenants; the adoption by the U.S. government of new laws, rules and regulations, such as those relating to organizational conflicts of interest issues; an inability to utilize existing or future tax benefits, including those related to our net operating losses and stock-based compensation expense, for any reason, including a change in law; variable purchasing patterns under U.S. government GSA schedules, blanket purchase agreements and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts; and other risks and factors described in Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report. In light of these risks, uncertainties and other factors, the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report might not prove to be accurate and you should not place undue reliance upon them. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the information disclosed in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section in Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2011.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Our performance under U.S. government contracts and compliance with the terms of those contracts and applicable laws and regulations are subject to continuous audit, review, and investigation by the U.S. government which may include such investigative techniques as subpoenas or civil investigative demands. Given the nature of our business, these audits, reviews, and investigations may focus, among other areas, on labor time reporting, sensitive and/or classified information access and control, executive compensation, and post government employment restrictions. We are not always aware of our status in such matters, but we are currently aware of certain pending audits and investigations involving labor time charging. In addition, from time to time, we are also involved in legal proceedings and investigations arising in the ordinary course of business, including those relating to employment matters, relationships with clients and contractors, intellectual property disputes, and other business matters. These legal proceedings seek various remedies, including claims for monetary damages in varying amounts that currently range up to $40.0 million or have a reasonably estimated outcome within that range, or are unspecified as to amount. Although the outcome of any such matter is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, we do not expect any of the currently ongoing audits, reviews, investigations, or litigation to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Six former officers and stockholders who had departed the firm prior to the acquisition, as described in our Annual Report have filed a total of nine suits in various jurisdictions, with original filing dates ranging from July 3, 2008 through December 15, 2009 (three of which were amended on July 2, 2010 and then further amended into one consolidated complaint on September 7, 2010), against us and certain of our current and former directors and officers. Each of the suits arises out of the acquisition, as described in our Annual Report, and alleges that the former stockholders are entitled to certain payments that they would have received if they had held their stock at the time of the acquisition. Some of the suits also allege that the acquisition price paid to stockholders was insufficient. The various suits assert claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, breach of fiduciary duty, civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, violations, violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, and/or securities and common law fraud. Two of these suits have been dismissed with all appeals exhausted and a third suit has been dismissed but the former stockholder has sought leave to re-plead in New York state court. Five of the remaining suits are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the sixth is pending in New York state court and the seventh is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The aggregate alleged damages sought in these seven remaining suits is approximately $348.7 million ($291.5 million of which is sought to be trebled pursuant to RICO), plus punitive damages, costs, and fees. Although the outcome of any of these cases is inherently uncertain and may be materially adverse, based on current information, we do not expect them to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2011.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.

Other Information

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 15, 2008, by and among Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Holding Corporation), Booz Allen Hamilton Investor Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Investor Corporation), Explorer Merger Sub Corporation and Booz & Company Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

2.2		Spin Off Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2008, by and among Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Booz & Company Holdings, LLC, Booz & Company Inc., Booz & Company Intermediate I Inc. and Booz & Company Intermediate II Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

2.3		Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger and the Spin Off Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2008, by and among Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Booz Allen Hamilton Investor Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Investor Corporation), Explorer Merger Sub Corporation, Booz & Company Holdings, LLC, Booz & Company Inc., Booz & Company Intermediate I Inc. and Booz & Company Intermediate II Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34972))

3.2		Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34972))

4.1		Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, among Booz Allen Hamilton Investor Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Investor Corporation), Explorer Merger Sub Corporation as the Initial Borrower, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., as the Surviving Borrower, and the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, in favor of Credit Suisse, as Collateral Agent, dated as of July 31, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

4.2		Guarantee Agreement, among Booz Allen Hamilton Investor Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Investor Corporation), Explorer Merger Sub Corporation as the Initial Borrower, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., as the Surviving Borrower, and the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, and Credit Suisse, as Administrative Agent, dated as of July 31, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

4.3		Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34972))

4.4		Irrevocable Proxy and Tag-Along Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2010 on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34972))

4.5		Form of Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.1		Credit Agreement, among Booz Allen Hamilton Investor Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Investor Corporation), Explorer Merger Sub Corporation, as the Initial Borrower, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., as the Surviving Borrower, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (formerly known as Credit Suisse), as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (formerly known as Credit Suisse), as Issuing Lender, Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers, and Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as Joint Bookrunners and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Co-Manager, dated as of July 31, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.2		First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.3		Loan Agreement, Waiver and Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34972))



10.4		Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as effected by the Loan Agreement, Waiver and Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 3, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34972))

10.5		Management Agreement, among Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (formerly known as Explorer Holding Corporation), Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., and TC Group V US, LLC, dated as of July 31, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.6		Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.7		Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Officers’ Rollover Stock Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.8		Form of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Rollover Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.9		Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.10		Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.11		Form of Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.12		Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors under the Equity Incentive Plan of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.13		Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees under the Equity Incentive Plan of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.14		Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.15		Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Officers’ Retirement Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.16		Officer’s Comprehensive Medical and Dental Plans (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.17		Retired Officer’s Comprehensive Medical and Dental Plans (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.18		Excess ECAP Payment Program (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.19		Group Variable Universal Life Insurance (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.20		Group Personal Excess Liability Insurance (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.21		Annual Performance Program (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.22		Form of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-167645))

10.23		Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2011 on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34972))

10.24		Officer Transition Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2011 on Form 10-K (File No. 001-34972))

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer*

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer*

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)*

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)*

101		The following materials from Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011; (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.**

*	Filed electronically herewith.

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


	Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
	Registrant

Date: November 3, 2011	By:	/S/ SAMUEL R. STRICKLAND
		Samuel R. Strickland
		Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Ralph W. Shrader, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared.

(b) [not applicable]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information.

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Samuel R. Strickland, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation.

(b) [not applicable]

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and will be retained by Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Director of the Company certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.